Monday, February 9, 2015

Be Still, Focus Your Eyes, and Type

I have been thinking a lot these days on how digital learning is different from f2f classrooms. Throughout this exploration, I am allowing myself to make some lofty assumptions as I jump down a few rabbit holes. Maybe digital learning bypasses the social interaction in f2f and immediately engages the cognitive. This may make digital learning a more efficient way to learn with more learning opportunities (clicks versus movements) within a given time and space. In a traditional f2f classroom, the student may divide their attention between social interaction and using in-class technology. However, the online student sits solely in front of the computer screen, and is therefore fully engaged in clicking, composing, and metacognition. Rearranging desks and chairs may change the rhetoric of the classroom. However, these options are restricted to movement in a limited space. For instance, movements and positioning between student and teacher when conferencing or collaboration within peer feedback groups construct a reality based on physical interaction. These f2f interactions create cognitive schemas, stereotypes, and judgments that can be hidden or manipulated in a digital environment. This masking of identity changes the use of rhetoric within the online space. With a click, time can be controlled, and perception of audience, purpose, and situation can perhaps be manipulated to create knowledge that produces alternative and hybrid discourses.   


1 comment:

  1. Matthew,

    You make some really interesting points here. Personally, I've always felt that I enjoy f2f because of the social interaction, and also because I believe knowledge is socially constructed by a group (sociocultural learning theory). However, your post is making me think differently... Can't knowledge still be socially constructed in an online space without the give-and-take of f2f classrooms? A strong argument in favor of socially-constructed knowledge in an online space is the fact that the information can be edited and built on in written text as a group. Perhaps this is true, since the online environment might skip right to engaging the cognitive, as you said.

    Man, you've given me a lot to think about!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.